Did Constellation Brands Pay Too Much for Meiomi ?

July 28, 2015 § Leave a comment

Many wine industry insiders were surprised at the lofty price Constellation Brands paid for Caymus’ Pinot Noir powerhouse, Meiomi. A deal that did not include any vineyard land or grape resources, from what we understand. However, if you believe that on-premise distribution is the benchmark of brand equity (build brands on-premise, build volume off-premise), then there may be some justification for this tidy sum.

Winemetrics is about to release a new report introducing its Wine Equity Quotient™ (WEQ) and Brand Equity Quotient™(BEQ). Both of these valuations are based on a wine’s (or brand’s) on-premise distribution characteristics which include:

  1. total number of listings (either by-the-glass or by-the-bottle, there is a separate WEQ for each)
  2. total number of chain/restaurant groups where it has distribution
  3. The diversity by chain type (Casual, Upscale Casual, Fine Dining) of its distribution
  4. Average Price

When Winemetrics compared the top 3 Pinot Noir By-the-Glass by their WEQ values, we came up with the following numbers.

  • Meiomi          WEQ – 29
  • Mark West    WEQ – 19
  • Mirassou       WEQ – 21

Constellation paid $160 million for Mark West in 2012. While we are unable to precisely determine Mark West Pinot Noir WEQ for this year, we do know that since it’s purchase this wine has increased on-premise distribution by about 40% since  2012. Using that number of total listings with Mark West’s current WEQ calculation, it would yield a WEQ of 13.

Let’s use this Wine Equity Quotient™ value with Mark West’s purchase price to estimate what Meiomi might be worth in today’s market:

160/13 = p/29 where p would be the purchase price of Meiomi in millions of dollars

p = 357 or $357 million dollars.

Certainly Constellation Brands used far more sophisticated analysis than this to determine Meiomi’s fair market value, but I don’t think they overpaid.

Winemetrics Wine Equity Quotient™ (WEQ) and Brand Equity Quotient™(BEQ) will be introduced in Winemetrics’ new 2015 Wine Buyer’s Report, our first report targeting wine buyers, beverage managers and wine professionals who sell to this group. This report will be released August 1, 2015.

Casual Chain Wine Selections Decline in 2014

November 19, 2014 § Leave a comment

If you are a recipient of Winemetrics’ newsletter, you have already seen this headline. Casual chains cut wine listings considerably in 2014. We think the primary cause of this is greater competition from craft beer and cocktails, which are successfully challenging wine distribution in this dining segment. I have already outlined how craft beer and spirits outperform wine in profitability in a previous post. Still, it appeared that wine was holding its own in casual chains until this year. We were shocked to see all of the top 10 casual chains in our survey reduce their wine selections along with regional chains. Below is a partial list of chains with reduced wine selections in 2014:

Olive Garden
Ruby Tuesday
Red Lobster
Red Robin
Longhorn Steakhouse
P.F. Chang’s
The Cheesecake Factory
Yard House

Overall reductions add up to over 17,500 lost By-the-Glass (BTG) placements and more than 22,600 By-the-Bottle (BTB) listings. A study reported by Cornell’s Center for Hospitality Research indicates that smaller list sell less wine overall so that wine revenues in these accounts will probably decline. This could become a self-fulling cycle in casual chains. “Reduce the wine list = sell less wine = reduce wine list further as the current selection of wines does not justify its investment” This sounds like a beverage program being run by accountants, not beverage professionals.

One thing is certain. The wine suppliers who were included in those lost -17,000+ BTG listings and -22,000+ BTB listings, will be selling fewer cases on-premise this year unless they find alternative outlets.

Syrah/Shiraz, Zinfandel Becoming ‘Optional’ Varieties

November 6, 2014 § Leave a comment

Syrah/Shiraz and Zinfandel, once among the top 10 varieties on-premise, have fallen to 16th and 15th respectively as reported by Winemetrics 2014 On-Premise Wine Distribution Report. Malbec now has more combined By-the-Bottle (BTB) and By-the-Glass placements than either and is ranked 11th. Red Blends, those non-traditional varietal mixes (not to be confused with Bordeaux Blends, Rhone Blends and Super Tuscans, which Winemetrics tracks separately) have jumped to 7th position.

Although Red Blends frequently incorporate Zinfandel and Syrah and often have similar flavor profiles, their catchy names and packaging, appeal more to Millennial consumers. More restaurants, especially casual chains with smaller lists, are dropping Zinfandel and Syrah/Shiraz from their wine lists.

How Can Wine Reverse its Decline On-Premise?

September 6, 2014 § 1 Comment

Before I write another word, let me provide a brief background of my experience in this industry. I have a B.S. in Soil Science and have worked as a vineyard manager and winemaker. I began drinking wine as a college freshman and took a job upon graduation picking grapes in upstate New York to learn about wine, excuse the pun, from the ground up. That ocurred because I had, during the 30 hours a week that I worked while going to classes full-time, I managed to accumulate the funds to purchase a 1969 J.Grivot Vosne-Romanee and a 1966 Chateau Calon Segur, two wines that changed my life forever.  I have worked every imaginable job in this industry, from production to sales and marketing.  In the course of my wine industry career of over 30 years, I have launched a number of successful wine brands and products. I have also witnessed failures and collapses of wine segments and brands largely due to the arrogance and close mindedness of those responsible. Market conditions in some cases played a role in these failures but the changing market conditions were apparent and largely ignored by those that could have affected the necessary changes to avert disaster.  Based on this experience and my position at Winemetrics, which has allowed me to track the progress of wine on-premise for the past decade, I offer the following heartfelt advice to my industry.

1. Start Innovating before it is too late

Innovation means creating compelling unique products, not a new name or label that you hope the consumer will find appealing. Look at what the artisanal spirits and craft beer industries are doing. New flavors, new processes, with exciting products as a result. Where are the new varieties to entice our wine consumers, where are the new production methods to create new flavors. Why not a Port barrel-aged Zinfandel or a Tannat-Syrah blend?

2. Listen to consumers and make something that fulfills a need

Do you think that the Master Distillers at Jim Beam woke up one morning and decided to create a Black Cherry flavored whiskey on a whim? There are currently more placements on cocktail lists of flavored whiskeys than there are for traditional ones, the same is true for vodka and rum. I’m certain the decision to make flavored products was not popular with the traditional production team but had they ignored this direction their companies would be out millions of dollars in profits. Fortunately, the distillers realized they were in the beverage business, not the whiskey business.

3. Discard the old models that are no longer relevant.

Mixologists have given us cocktails with an incredible variety of flavors using non-traditional ingredients that have vastly expanded the flavor landscape of libations. Craft brewers have created entire new categories of beer. I remember when the first Pumpkin Ale was introduced, now the annual release of this single product overwhelms that of the venerable Oktoberfest beers. Both artisanal mixology and craft beer are American (i.e. U.S.) phenomena. We have a culture of innovation and chafe at the rules meekly followed in Europe. Rheinheitsgebot? Sorry Hans, we’re putting pumpkins and nutmeg in our beer and it tastes great. How does the wine industry react to new ideas? Let’s review a historical example.  I was already working in the wine industry for several years when Jess Jackson released his signature Chardonnay. The reaction of most of the wine press was not positive. I remember the backlash in the wine press about this upstart winery (KJ) that blends grapes from different regions and allows some residual sugar in the finished wine! Quelle horreur! To this day I read blogs and hear wine buyers rail against this ‘inauthentic’ wine that happens to be the #1 wine on-premise and has probably made wine drinkers out of millions of otherwise disinterested consumers. Let me put this another way. This is probably the most popular wine in America, which wine consumers obviously love, and you, Mr./Ms. Wine Gatekeeper loath this product because it does not conform to your parochial definition of ‘acceptable’ wine. Are you really serious? Do you think there is an equivalent individual or group of individuals in the beer industry saying this about Pumpkin Ale? No, because its introduction captured new drinkers and was overwhelmingly positive for the industry. My suggestion to self-appointed ‘wine authorities’ who hate products that encourage consumers to drink wine? Find another career.
4. Bypass the Gatekeepers
The wine industry is cursed with a group of narrow-minded gatekeepers who prevent excellent products from reaching a demanding and appreciative audience. 

5 Reasons Why Wine Is Losing Share to Cocktails and Beer On-Premise

September 4, 2014 § 2 Comments

5 Reasons Why Wine Is Losing Share to Cocktails and Beer On-Premise

  1. Competition
    When I first began selling on-premise in the early 1980’s there was no competition to wine. Craft beer and spirits were rare and wine was the recognized companion to food. Fine dining restaurants eschewed beer and had, at best, rudimentary cocktail lists. Wine was the only option and it developed in a competitive vacuum. Those conditions no long exist and wine is having its primacy eroded.
  2. Profit
    Wine is the least profitable alcoholic beverage a restaurant can serve. Bottled beer is more profitable, draft beer, properly managed, is even more profitable and cocktails provide the best margin of all. This means it is in the best interest of the restaurant to promote these other beverages, not wine. This does not even factor in the fact that a cocktail and bottle/draft are guaranteed to be fresh, unlike a BTG serving of wine which may have been opened for over 24 hours prior to serving.
  1. Price/Value
    I have witnessed (and can objectively verify) the contraction and ‘specialization’ of BTG wine list at a time when cocktails and beer are moving in the opposite direction (see 4. Innovation). Given the options of a 20-ounce glass of iconic craft beer or imaginative cocktail versus a mass-market common varietal (which may be the most expensive of the three) what would the average Millennial choose? My guess is the wine would be dead last.  Here is a concrete example. I was in a South American restaurant having dinner. There were no craft beers on the list (surprising that can still happen but it does) and a glasses of the most ubiquitous brands of the most common varieties were in the $9 range. For a dollar more I could purchase a grilled pineapple and cilantro margarita made with Don Julio Reposado and Cointreau. Which would you purchase? By the way, that margarita was magnificent and judging by the condition of the open wine bottles on the back bar, there was no choice.
  2. Innovation
    The explosion of flavored and uniquely aged spirits as well as specially craft and aged beers and ciders has placed the United States in the forefront of innovation in these industries. Foreign beer and spirits producers are in awe of what has happened here. Fifteen years ago, American beer was still largely a joke in Europe, now we are making products that totally surpass most of what is offered there. I can find a better beer selection in my hometown bar in rural Pennsylvania (from mostly local producers) than I could in Frankfurt or Berlin. While America does not have this edge yet in spirits, we are most certainly the innovation leader is crafting superior cocktails from domestic and international ingredients.  Our success in beer and cocktails can be directly attributed to disregarding the European models. The European model for beer was the Rheinheitsgebot, where pure, natural beer could only be composed of yeast, barley, hops and water. European cocktails used only local or country specific ingredients (English gin and Italian vermouth in the same glass, never!)
  3. Image
    Wine no longer has a leading-edge image, it is the beverage of choice of Boomers (aka parents of Millennials) while Millennials themselves have more eclectic preferences. On of the reasons I started drinking wine was it was a beverage my parents didn’t drink. With wine as the Boomers top choice it is no surprise that their offspring are seeking out different libations. Craft beer and artisanal spirits have captured the imagination and discretionary income of this younger segment of the population.

Best Drink Lists of 2014

August 7, 2014 § Leave a comment

Winemetrics has expanded its database to encompass a vast amount of drink list information. Our inaugural 2014 Drink List Report will be available for purchase next week. To give you a snapshot of this innovative report, which surveys the largest national and regional restaurant chains, please see our choices for the Top Casual, Upscale Casual and Fine Dining Drinks List Winners and Runner-Ups below.  We have identified the exceptional programs, based on size, pricing, diversity and web presence.

Best Drinks Lists of 2014


Casual Chains

Winner : Yard House

Web Presence: Excellent, detailed information by location but without pricing.

Wine BTG:  Average in size but a diverse selection with excellent pricing.

Cocktail List: Well above average in size (35+) with a wide variety of imaginative libations.

Beer List: Off the charts, over 25 draft beers and more than 100 in bottles and cans

Pro: Most comprehensive beer list we have surveyed.

Con: Menu is the size of the Gutenberg Bible and drink prices are not listed online.


Runner Up:  BJs Brewhouse

Web Presence: Excellent, detailed information by location but without pricing.

Wine BTG:  Above average selection with 25 wines; very reasonably priced.

Cocktail List: A selection of 35, many from original recipes by BJ’s bartenders.

Beer List: Nearly 60 different brews, at least 10 of which are brewed in-house.

Pro: Entire menu and beverage list available on one sheet, the ultimate in convenience.

Con: Beer list selection lacks excitement.



Upscale Casual Chains

Winner:  Lucky 32 (part of Quaintance-Weaver Restaurants and Hotels, a small restaurant group in NC)

Web Presence: Excellent, complete drinks lists in PDF, location-specific with pricing

Wine BTG:  Excellent, 50 wines offered in 3 sizes, including 3 oz. tastes. Nearly every BTB selection is available BTG. Three wine flights offered.  Superb value and diversity.

Cocktail List: Has 20 very imaginative offerings often with artisanal spirits, attractively priced

Beer List:  Excellent. Over 40 brews, mostly local and nationally known craft beers.

Pro: Probably one of the best overall drinks list we have ever seen. Con: None



Runner-Up: P.F. Chang’s China Bistro

Web Presence: Excellent, detailed information and prices by location

Wine BTG:  Superior, 40+ wines, nearly every BTB selection is available BTG. All wines available by the half-glass.

Cocktail List: A selection of 13 is about average for the segment, but their Asian-influenced libations are unique to this chain.

Beer List: A recent upgrade to the beer list has put it on par with its highly regarded wine selection. About 2/3 of the selection is composed of a diverse selection of fine craft beers.

Pro:  Beer program has caught up with the category-leading wine list. Con: Getting to account specific information was a little cumbersome online.



Fine Dining

Winner:  Flemings

Web Presence: Very Good.  Lots of detail available but no prices. Lists must be perused segment by segment which is inconvenient.

Wine BTG:  Superb, 90+ wines, the largest BTG selection of any major chain.  Pricing on the high side, which is expected, given the support required for such variety.

Cocktail List: With 22 selections, Fleming’s cocktail list is slightly above average in size but also above average in pricing

Beer List:  Solid list of 17 beers, half of them well-known craft brews,

Pro: Excellent wine selection carries the day here.

Con:Searching the selection online was somewhat difficult and lack of pricing and BTG designations omits vital information.  As each Flemings has a wine list addendum specific to their restaurant, it would be beneficial if this information were provided online.


Runner-Up:  Seasons 52

Web Presence: Excellent, detailed information with prices

Wine BTG:  Excellent, 50+ wines, most BTB selections are available BTG. Very diverse and well-priced

Cocktail List: With just 12 libations, Season’s 52 is below average in this segment. It also appears to rely on just a handful of spirits brands.

Beer List: A serviceable list of 18 with a handful of craft beers.

Pros/Cons: Extremely convenient drink list both to read and download.  The remarkable wine selection carries this beverage program but a few adjustments to the beer and cocktail list could make it a contender for the top spot.

10 Ways Restaurants Undermine Their Beverage Programs

June 3, 2014 § Leave a comment

The best planned and well-conceived beverage program can be derailed or at least minimized by common mistakes. Here are 10 of them and they are far more common than you would expect.

  1. Failing to post wine and drink menus on the restaurant website OR.
    • Leaving outdated information on the site
    • Posting ‘sample’ lists that don’t reflect the diversity and scope of the beverage program
    • Incomplete list e.g have wine BTG but no BTB list or fail to include craft beer and/or a complete cocktail list
  1. Failing to provide pricing on drink list (common problem for beer and cocktails). Would you order from a dinner menu that had no prices? So why the double standard for drinks?
  2. Failing to include drinks (wine BTG, beer, cocktails) on the food menu.
  3. Using the words “Ask your server about our (reserve wine list, craft beers, small-batch bourbon, etc) .” If it’s worth selling, it is worth placing on a menu that may have to be reprinted once and a while.  Server’s have a hard enough time memorizing the daily food specials – don’t expect them to recite and describe the 20 craft beers you pour.
  4. If there is a drinks menu: failing to place the wine list, drink list, beer list on the same menu. While a ‘complete’ beverage menu  is common in casual chains, many upscale-casual and fine-dining establishments force their patrons to juggle menus.
  5. Not having a craft beer list (or a cocktail list)
  6. Not training your bartenders to have a background on what they are serving.
  7. Treating beer taps as faucets (bartenders who let a beer tap ‘run’ prior to pouring a draft is one of greatest sources of lost beverage revenue)
  8. Excessive pricing of mass-market brands.  Consumer seeing over a 3 times retail price for a wine they frequently see on an end-aisle display at their local liquor store will assume the restaurant is overcharging for everything and will probably not return (FYI, I don’t)
  9. Not having tastings or flights of wine and beer (some enterprising chains offer cocktail flights by the way).

Eureka! The Future of Upscale Casual Dining?

June 3, 2014 § 2 Comments

I recently visited the San Luis Obispo location of a small, 10-unit restaurant chain based in California named Eureka!. And yes, like Archimedes, I do believe I found something extraordinary. Eureka! has a cutting-edge beverage list with an artisanal and local focus for its wine, beer and cocktails. The food focus is local and affordable. Only hormone and antibiotic free beef is used in the gourmet burgers which range in price from $9-$12; nearly all entrees are under $20 (their Hangar Steak is $23.50).

The beverage program, however, is what distinguishes Eureka!  By my count there were 33 draft beers available, with not a single mass-market beer among them. The taps were divided into 19 ‘tried and true’ offerings (Lagunitas IPA, Allagash White, Stone Ruination) at $5-$9 and 10 Rotating Taps that offered more expensive ($6-$11) esoteric drafts. The 10 offerings of bottled beers were mostly rarities priced over $20/bottle with the highest-priced offering $65.

The cocktail list remained true to concept with 27 artisanal spirits and 9 Classic Cocktails. The focus here was on the cocktail ingredients, not the mixology. Again, the focus was local (California) and no mass-market brands were listed on the drink menu.

Eureka!’s wine selection was the smallest segment of the beverage list, just 14 by-the-bottle and 10 by-the-glass offerings. Wines were primarily from the Central Coast area but far from artisanal. Again, no mass-market brands made the cut, but the selections were far from cutting edge.  All the offerings were from mainstream varieties (half of the selection was comprised of Chardonnay, Cabernet Sauvignon and Pinot Noir); there were no stand-out rarities. By-the-glass offerings ranged from $6-$12 and bottles from $22-$69. It appeared that wine was placed on the menu merely to appease the occasional wine drinkersthat might happen to stumble in. This assumption is reinforced by the fact that Eureka! offers both a ‘build your own’ beer and spirit flight yet no such option is offered for wine.

The only flaw in Eureka!’s execution is there is no way to see how inventive and extensive its beverage program is as no drink lists are posted on its website. (See our post “How Restaurants Undermine Their Beverage Programs”.

Evidence that the Eureka! concept resonates with Millennials can be substantiated by the success of similar concepts around the country. Umami Burger, Plan B, Slater’s 50/50 and Square 1, among others, follow the local, artisanal, beer-centric model and are adding new locations at a rapid pace.  In all of the gourmet burger chains I have visited, wine plays a secondary role, yet I doubt there is a more burger-friendly beverage on earth than a brambly, full-bodied Zinfandel. Perhaps it’s time for the wine industry to address this gap in its on-premise coverage.

(Note: Eureka! is not a client of Winemetrics, nor do any of its employees have an affliation with anyone associated with our company. Also, Eureka! has not been nor will it be solicited for any future compensatory relationship with Winemetrics).

10 Ways Craft Beer is Outmaneuvering Wine

May 23, 2014 § 1 Comment

(this post still needs some editing but I wanted to get it out to the public as I have not seen these important issues addressed elsewhere)

  1. Value
    As I write this I am reviewing the beverage list of a national chain with a decent wine, beer and cocktail selection.  In this restaurant I can spend $9 and get a 6 oz. glass of Blackstone Merlot or for slightly less, a 22 oz. bottle of Stone Brewing’s Arrogant Bastard Ale. I will confess that I know both of these products very well and the beer is an exceptional value, priced about twice the retail price. On the other hand I can probably buy a full bottle at retail for the glass price, a 4 times retail mark-up. Oh, the ale is rated 93 by The Beer Advocate, the Merlot I doubt is held in such high esteem.
  2. Innovation
    In 30 years the United States beer industry  has gone from and object of international ridicule to the epicenter of brewing innovation.  While European brewers remain mired in tradition, American craft brewers are creating completely new products, even partnering with wine and spirits producers to create new hybrid products e.g. Dogfish Head Noble Rot, a combination of botrytis-affected Viognier grape must and beer.
  3. Promotion
    Craft brewers have been able to do everything wine has done and more.  The basic difference is that the preponderance of local brewers means that the person attending the beer dinner is the actual owner or brewmaster, not a stand-in from the distributor or importer. Brewers are willing to  take risks to promote their products in ways that most wineries would find ‘uncomfortable’. If you are a fan of the HBO hit series, “Game of Thrones” you know  that there are multiple references to wine and wine regions. The leading characters are all seen drinking wine. Beer on the show is portrayed as the beverage of the common man and never mentioned by name. Yet the highly respected Ommegang brewery of Cooperstown has now released its 4th Game of Thrones beer under licensing from the show’s creators. According to industry sources these beers account for 8% of Ommegang revenue. So where is the Game of Thrones wine? Or perhaps a better question is, where is there a winery with an equivalent reputation to Ommegang willing to take the risk of producing a Game of Thrones wine?
  4. Community
    This ties in with number 3. Who is a local consumer and restaurant going to support more, a brewer in his/her state (or hometown) or a winery 2000 miles away. Local nearly always trumps global. Also, and this is very important. Brewers and their gatekeepers don’t trash talk other brewers! During the 4 years I served as Director of Sales at New Amsterdam brewing, I never heard one brewer malign another, even if it were Budweiser (which performed remarkably well in blind tastings). Compare that with the nasty treatment received by wine blogger s and certain sommeliers regarding the products of America’s largest wineries.  If it weren’t for Gallo and Kendall-Jackson making wine accessible to wine drinkers, most of us in this industry would not have jobs, yet the unrelenting  vitriol directed at most mass-market wine in the blogosphere has no parallel in brewing.  Sam Calagione, the founder of the highly regarded Dogfish Head Brewery once said, “The craft brewing industry is 99% asshole free.” Can the wine industry make the same claim? Those of us who have spent years in the wine business chuckle at the proposition.
  5. Venues
    Beer has national and regional chains devoted to it. Yardhouse, Rockbottom, B.J.s Brewhouse, Gordon                 Biersch, even local San Diego brewer Karl Strauss has 7 restaurants devoted to its output. Where is the                 equivalent for the wine industry, where is a national chain of wine bars? Craft brewers have their ‘temples’           spread across the country, proselytizing thousands everyday to the glories of beer.
  1. Cross-Fertilization
    Craft brewers have used wine yeast, used bourbon and wine barrels, fruit, spices, wine must even                             Brettanomyces to make new products. Their imagination and experimentation seems limitless. They are willing to release small amounts of these products to the general public in the form of limited release bottle or draft and create a new product to replace it when it runs out.
  1. New Traditions
    There was a time that fall meant one thing to beer lovers, Oktoberfest beers. Now it means Pumpkin Ale and the start of Winter Warmer, Christmas Ales followed by spring’s Bock Beers and then summer ales, Hefenweizen and shandys.  Granted, brewers have more flexibility when creating seasonal products than wine producers, but their model of collectively releasing a specific product seasonally creates anticipation by the consume and a great deal of positive PR. The only equivalent in the wine industry is Beaujolais Nouveau which, after years of hype and relatively sub-standard product has pretty much eliminated any Beaujolais from mainstream wine list.
  2. Customer Loyalty
    Craft brewing loyalty is based on location and innovation. You want to test this – ask a Vermont beer aficionado about Heady Topper or a one from Northern California about Pliny the Elder or one from Chicago about Bourbon County.  The are all cult beers , all in high demand, 95+ rated products that any working class beer drinker can afford.  And all are in limited supplies that appear just once a year. Does the wine industry have an equivalent?  Of course there is Screaming Eagle et al. but these cannot be accessed or purchased by commoners, 1-precenters only need apply.
  3. Food Compatibility
    American food (comfort food that is, not the elitist American cuisine created in the past generation) is first and foremost a beer compatible cuisine. Burger, barbecue, fried chicken, all type of picnic fare is working class, food for the masses, all of whom grew up consuming beer.  In the world of casual dining, it is beer that has the advantage by virtue of its historic association with American ‘peasant’ food and the fact that the mainly northern European immigrants that brought this food to America also brought their brewing skills.
  4. Gatekeepers
    In comparison to wine, the beer gatekeepers are fewer in number and less strident in their opinions.  This allows them to embrace new products, technologies and promotions with greater ease than the opinion shapers in the wine industry. Do you recall the reaction by Italy’s DOC when the Antinori family wished to release wines made with non-traditional grapes in Tuscany. They were forced to use a table wine designation. In the 1990’s, when I was presenting Sonoma Wine to NYC restaurateurs at a time when Sonoma was winning more medals in competition that Napa wine in all varieties except Cabernet Sauvignon, it was extremely difficult to break into Napa-centric wine selections.  The prejudice was found when introducing  ultra-premium Chilean wines that clearly outmatched its Californian and European competition in its price range. The critical difference with beer gatekeepers is they have not built barriers to accepting new ideas and concepts.

Casual Chains Slash Wine Selections

April 7, 2014 § 1 Comment

According to Winemetrics preliminary 2014 wine list survey, 8 leading casual dining chains have reduced their wine selections, most  by double digits.  The following data indicates the steepest across the board decline we have ever witnessed in on-premise wine selections.  This may portend a trend by national accounts to shift emphasis from wine to the faster growing craft beer and cocktail segments of their beverage programs.

Winemetrics compared its mid-year 2013 wine list data with recently acquired data from identical chains this year.  Our findings indicate the following combined by-the-bottle and by-the-glass wine listings decreases by percentage.

Carrabba’s                       -6%

Longhorn Steakhouse      -22%

Olive Garden                   -28%

Outback Steakhouse        -18%

Red Lobster                      -6%

Romano’s                          -22%

Ruby Tuesday                   -17%


We will post more insights on this trend as our 2014 wine list update continues.